Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Ackerman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1900No. 3461PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whitman County. — Hon. William McDonald, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

This is an action for damages for the conversion of wheat, the alleged property of the respondent, by the appellant. The complaint in substance alleged ownership and possession of a certain tract of land in Whitman county, Washington, and ownership of a certain volunteer crop of wheat which had grown on said land in the year 1897; that on the 26th day of July, 1897, defendant wrongfully and unlawfully entered upon said land and wrongfully and unlawfully harvested and converted to his own use two hundred and seventy-four sacks of wheat grown…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Stockwell v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Reddish v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Johnston v. FishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Dollar v. RoddenberySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lynch v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Schaefer v. E. F. Gregory Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. In Re Kuhn's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Miethke v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API