Akers v. Lord
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered May 31, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in actions to foreclose loggers’ liens.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Consolidated actions to foreclose loggers’ liens. W. H. Lord, as the owner of certain timber land, contracted with E. S. Wright to log the same and deliver the logs to the mill of the Two Rivers Lumber Company, near Tolt. Wright employed Akers and eight other respondents in his logging operations, and not having received their due, they filed liens on the logs and lumber at the mill and upon other lumber lying upon the right of way of the Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Company, about a mile from the mill. These liens were all sustained, except the one of Bernard Krakenberger, whose…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dolan v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Robins v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- O'Connor v. BurnhamWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Bradford v. Underwood Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by16 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Chef-Reddy Foods Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Mitchell v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Adams v. HarveyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Tennant v. F. C. Whitney & SonsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.