Machado v. Fernandez
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The facts of this case, as they are shown by the complaint, are as follows:—
The plaintiff and the defendant were accommodation indorsers of a promissory note, which was made and dated February 26, 1885, and was payable on demand with interest. On the ninth day of July, 1886, the payee of the note demanded payment thereof from the makers, and his demand not being complied with, gave notice of its dishonor to the indorsers. Subsequently the payee brought suit on the note against the makers and indorsers, and thereupon the plaintiff, without any trial of the case, paid to him the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merritt v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Pardee v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Keyes v. FenstermakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by9 opinions
- Merchs. Nat'l Bank of Santa Monica v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Anderson v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Jones v. NichollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kellogg v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.