Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Lopez

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1904No. S.F. No. 3022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Suit on a promissory note for the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, with interest, etc. The note runs' from the defendant Lopez to H. F. Anderson as payee. It was indorsed by the latter to the Bank of British Columbia; and upon payment by Anderson was, by his direction and for his use, assigned by the bank to the plaintiff. The defense set up in the answer is in effect that the note was signed by Lopez for the accommodation of Anderson, and that it was without consideration. The verdict and judgment was for the defendant. The appeal is by the plaintiff from an order denying his motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. Ah WeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Norton v. . CoonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Leeke v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Machado v. FernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howell v. War Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Josephian v. LionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Amalgamated Gold Mines Co. v. RidgelyWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API