Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Shaffer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1929No. Docket No. 5207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing her action, she having failed to amend her complaint after an order sustaining a demurrer thereto.

The complaint alleges the following facts: On April 1, 1912, plaintiff loaned $500 to one Shaffer, accepting as evidence of the latter’s indebtedness his note for $500, dated April 1, 1910 (that date having been inserted by mutual mistake, all parties having intended the date to be written 1912), payable three months after date with interest at seven per cent per annum. To secure payment of this note Shaffer executed a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Walton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ryus v. GrubleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Chisholm v. HouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. CIT Corporation v. SandersonDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API