Legal Opinion
Grayson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 2008No. 06-CM-1419PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The majority of the court has concluded that the evidence is sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction of second-degree theft. To be sure, as Judge Schwelb demonstrates in Part III A of his opinion, appellant did not confess to the crime. However, we are not prepared to say that, when the remaining evidence is “view[ed] ... in the light most favorable to the prosecution, [no ] rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
We will not attempt to set forth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shewarega v. YegzawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- National Housing Partnership v. Municipal Capital Appreciation Partners I, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re C.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lazo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re J.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Cerron H. Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Crawford v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Crawford v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.