Legal Opinion
In re C.J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 2, 1986No. 85-588PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant, a juvenile, was adjudicated a delinquent after a bench trial on a charge of robbery in violation of D.C. Code § 22-2901 (1981). On appeal, appellant claims that the trial court’s verdict was “plainly wrong” because it was based on incorrect factual findings and on insufficient evidence. In addition, appellant asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to reopen cross-examination of two government witnesses on the subject of bias, and in failing to impose appropriate sanctions for the government’s alleged Brady1 and Jencks Act2 violations. Finally, appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Auxier v. KraiselDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Blackledge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shewarega v. YegzawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Lazo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- National Housing Partnership v. Municipal Capital Appreciation Partners I, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re D.N.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Grayson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.