Cerron H. Hawkins v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a bench trial, the judge found appellant guilty of second-degree theft of a bicycle that Metro Police officers, as part of a so called bait-bike operation, had placed on a bicycle rack near the entrance to a Metro station. Appellant, conceding that “[t]he only disputed evidence in this case relates ... to the element of intent” (Br. for Appellant at 7), argues that the trial judge misapprehended the law in rejecting his defense that he believed the bicycle had been abandoned, because the judge found that he could not reasonably have held that belief in the circumstances.
The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- John W. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Foster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- RAMON R. CHERRY v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- People of Michigan v. Kerri Lynn ThorneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Townsend v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Alisha Townsend v. DCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018