Legal Opinion

National Housing Partnership v. Municipal Capital Appreciation Partners I, L.P.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2007No. 03-CV-1080, 03-CV-1253, 05-CV-32 and 05-CV-62PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

These appeals, arising under Maryland law, require us to delve into the meaning of an agreement furnishing security for the payment of a promissory note and the requirements of former Article 9, the Secured Transactions Article, of the Uniform Commercial Code. The parties’ disputes began when National Housing Partnership (“NHP”) defaulted on a $3.2 million note payment, leading Municipal Capital Appreciation Partners I, L.P. (“MCAP”) to foreclose on the collateral and acquire it for $1.4 million. In the ensuing litigation, NHP was held liable for the entire amount of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kasten Construction Co. v. Rod Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. In Re Zsa Zsa LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aziken v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Shewarega v. YegzawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Bolton v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Xenophon Strategies, Inc. v. Jernigan Copeland & Anderson, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Blue v. Fremont Investment & LoanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API