Legal Opinion
Riss & Co. v. Local 107 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 21, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 27503PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, District Judge.
On January 6, 1960, plaintiff instituted this action for damages arising out of an alleged illegal strike. Defendants’ ■answer was seasonably filed on January 26, 1960, and it denied several allegations of the plaintiff and raised several defenses to the complaint. On December 5, 1960 defendants filed the present motion wherein they seek to add an additional defense to their answer and to add two counterclaims.
A. Amendment of the Answer
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), 28 U.S.C. provides in part:
“(a) Amendments. A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Cravatts v. Klozo Fastener Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- American Optical Co. v. New Jersey Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Harvey v. Eimco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Gunnip v. Warner Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Aalco Construction Company, a Corporation, and Robert W. Sewell v. F. H. Linneman Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.