Legal Opinion
Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 28, 1953No. 3514PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, for the recovery of treble damages allegedly caused by the defendants’ violation of the antitrust laws. A previous judgment for the plaintiffs was reversed upon appeal, and the case was remanded to this court where it now awaits retrial. The defendants have moved, under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for leave to amend their answer by setting up as a defense to the plaintiffs’ claim the two-year Illinois statute of limitations, Ill.Rev.Stat. Chap. 83, § 15, Smith-Hurd…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Emich Motors Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Hoskins Coal & Dock Corp. v. Truax Traer Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Jones v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Downey v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Riley v. MEBA Pension TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Muskin Shoe Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1958
- Alvado v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Riss & Co. v. Local 107 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- George McArthur & Sons, Inc. v. Safe-Play Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.