Legal Opinion
Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1941No. 4706PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss the action because the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and, in turn, denying a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. See Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co., D.C.Md.1940, 32 F.Supp. 722.
In considering a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, we must treat every allegation of the complaint as admitted. See Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co., 8 Cir., 1940, 108 F.2d 302, 305; Smith v. Blackwell, D.C.E.D.S.C.1940, 34…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Howard v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Hill v. IglehartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Whitaker v. Whitaker Iron Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1916
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Reyes v. Sucesión de Sánchez SotoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
- Bragg v. Warwick Shoppers World, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Carroll v. Morrison Hotel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.