Legal Opinion
Miller v. Steinbach
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 6, 1967No. 66 Civ. 356PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Irving Miller moves, pursuant to Rules 21, 15(a), and 4(i) (1) (D), F.R.Civ.P., to join as additional party defendant, Milton Berzin, to amend his complaint, and to serve the amended complaint on Berzin.
In his original complaint, plaintiff, a former shareholder of the Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation (BLH), brought this derivative action, on behalf of himself and other former BLH shareholders similarly situated, against defendants Armour and Company (Armour); former officers and directors of BLH; T. M. Evans, a former shareholder of BLH; Goldman,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Backus Plywood Corp. v. Commercial Decal, Inc. And Alfred DuhrssenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Miller v. SteinbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States ex rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- UNR Industries, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. LoweyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Koal Industries Corp. v. Asland, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Benzoni v. GreveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.