Legal Opinion

Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 1956No. 18-2733PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAIM, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on March 21, 1955, dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.

This action was commenced October 16, 1941, when plaintiffs, Emich Motors Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Emich Motors, and U. S. Acceptance Corporation, hereinafter referred to as U. S. Acceptance, filed a complaint for treble damages under the anti-trust laws, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 et seq., against defendants, General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
United States v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
Charles Baker v. F & F Investment, Sidney Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.