Legal Opinion
Mayes v. Byers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1943No. 33,202PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pirsig, Justice.
During the period covering the incidents here related, defendant Byers operated a cafe at 253 Hennepin avenue, Minneapolis. He had obtained a license to sell intoxicating liquor as an “on sale” dealer, and for the purpose of obtaining this license had filed a statutory bond in the sum of $8,000 pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, § 340.12 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 3200-26), and a similar Minneapolis ordinance. Appellant was surety on the bond. The main room of the cafe contained a bar at which intoxicating liquor was sold. From a rear corner of the main room a stairway led to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Bott v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Sworski v. ColmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Dusha v. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.