Legal Opinion

Bott v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1885PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a verdict of $950 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtYanderburgh, J.

The charter of the city of St. Paul empowers the city council, by ordinance, to compel persons to fasten their horses or other animals attached to vehicles, while standing in the streets; such ordinance to have the force of law within the municipal jurisdiction, and to be enforced by the proper penalties. In pursuance of this provision the following ordinance was passed, and was in force when the accident out of which this action arose, occurred: “It shall not hereafter be lawful for any teamster or driver or owner, or any person or persons having in charge any team attached to any vehicle…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Parker v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Smith v. Milwaukee Builders' & Traders' ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API