Legal Opinion

Sworski v. Colman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1939No. 31,950PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from orders sustaining defendants’ separate demurrers to his amended complaint. The grounds for the several demurrers are: (1) That several causes of action are improperly united, and (2) that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action. The orders do not disclose whether one or both grounds pleaded formed the basis therefor, nor is there any memorandum accompanying them.

The action was brought by the special administrator of the estate of Clifford Sworski, deceased, to recover damages under the death by wrongful act statute, as amended, 3…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Demge v. FeiersteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Fest v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Couchman v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Benes v. CampionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Koski v. PakkalaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Randall v. Village of ExcelsiorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Strobel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API