Garstka v. Russo
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal: (1) Whether the award of the arbitrators was valid and binding upon the parties, and (2) whether the evidence supports the findings of the trial court.
The Arbitration Award.
Although both the items of labor and materials were submitted to the arbitrators, their work was incomplete in that they dealt only with the extent and value of services performed. The defendants argue the award of $1,500 for services is binding notwithstanding the fact the arbitrators failed to act on the second matter submitted to them. The defendants rely on Donaldson v. Buhlman…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canfield v. Watertown Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Koepke v. E. Liethen Grain Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Goldmann Trust v. GoldmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Donaldson v. BuhlmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Stubbings v. McGregorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scherrer Construction Co. v. Burlington Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc Police DepartmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- McKenzie v. WarmkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Smith v. Rhode Island State Services for the Blind & Visually HandicappedDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.