Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Warmka

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1978No. 75-829PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

Warmka entered into a contract with McKenzie whereby Warmka agreed to install a seamless floor covering in a kitchen at St. Joseph’s Memorial Hospital in Hillsboro. The floor covering was to meet certain specifications, and the contract price was to be $3,092.

The flooring subsequently installed by Warmka was rejected by McKenzie because the materials used did not conform to the specifications of the contract and because of alleged, but unspecified, defects of workmanship in the surface of the flooring.

Warmka’s efforts to remedy the defects were unacceptable to McKenzie. McKenzie contracted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Canfield v. Watertown Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Scherrer Construction Co. v. Burlington Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Plante v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc Police DepartmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. P.G. Miron Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Manu-Tronics, Inc. v. Effective Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Milwaukee Police Ass'n v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API