Legal Opinion

Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2018No. 2015AP002627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

*353¶ 1 The petitioner, Capital Cartage, Inc. (Capital Cartage), seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming the circuit court's determination that real estate broker Mark McNally (McNally) is entitled to a commission pursuant to the listing contract between the parties.1 Contrary to the court of appeals' determination, Capital Cartage asserts that McNally is not entitled to a commission because the offer to purchase McNally procured contains substantial variances from the seller's terms as set forth in the listing contract.

¶ 2 Specifically, Capital Cartage argues…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Courtney C. BeamonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southport Commons, LLC v. DOTWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Wisconsin Elections Commission v. Devin LeMahieuWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People of Michigan v. Tavon Johnathon MageeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API