Koepke v. E. Liethen Grain Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
There is no controversy as to the validity of the agreement for arbitration, or the appointment of the arbitrators. A review of the evidence discloses that the trial court was warranted in finding that there was no corruption, fraud, undue means, partiality, or misconduct on their part in making the award; that they passed solely upon the matters submitted to them; that they were not mistaken in their findings; and that their findings sustained their award.
No useful purpose will be served by a detailed discussion of the evidence. Due consideration and appreciation of the well established…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Pierce Engine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Eau Claire v. Eau Claire Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Lower Baraboo River Drainage District v. SchirmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Rottman v. ToftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Herman Andrae Electrical Co. v. CourteenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by19 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
- Joint School District No. 10 v. Jefferson Education Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- American Almond Products Co. v. Consolidated Pecan Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.