United States v. Kentner
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Kilday, Judge:
The instant special court-martial case involves a rehearing, and that fact gives rise to the certified question before us.
Despite his plea of not guilty accused was, at his initial trial, convicted on a single charge and specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. The convening authority of that special court-martial approved the findings and sentence but the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction thereafter set them aside and ordered a rehearing. In due course accused was again tried…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. ZagarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. GrantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. ButlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. LewandowskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. CulpUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.