Legal Opinion

United States v. Kentner

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 2, 1962No. 15,402PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

The instant special court-martial case involves a rehearing, and that fact gives rise to the certified question before us.

Despite his plea of not guilty accused was, at his initial trial, convicted on a single charge and specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. The convening authority of that special court-martial approved the findings and sentence but the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction thereafter set them aside and ordered a rehearing. In due course accused was again tried…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. ZagarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. GrantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. LewandowskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. CulpUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API