Legal Opinion
J.R. v. D.P.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 2012No. B236047PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*378Opinion
GRIMES, J.
SUMMARY
This is a paternity action in which the court found two men to be presumed fathers of the child, and concluded that the biological father’s presumption of paternity, under the particular circumstances, was controlling, as it was “the presumption which on the facts [was] founded on the weightier considerations of policy and logic . . . .” (Fam. Code, § 7612, subd. (b).) The mother and the other presumed father appeal this ruling. They also assert the biological father had no standing to bring the paternity action in the first place because he was not a presumed father…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Dawn D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services v. Irene V.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Santa Clara County Department of Family and Childrren's Services v. J.J.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Neil S. v. Mary L.California Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- V.S. v. M.L.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Dent v. Wolf, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- C.A. v. C.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Dent v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- In re Danny M. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.