Legal Opinion

Santa Clara County Department of Family and Childrren's Services v. J.J.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2012No. H038322PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*544Opinion

PREMO, J.

D.M., the third child of V.S. (mother), was taken into protective custody directly from the hospital where he was bom. The juvenile court sustained a petition filed by the Santa Clara County Department of Family and Children’s Services (the Department) pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, finding that D.M. came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. The juvenile court also found that mother’s boyfriend, respondent J.J., who is not D.M.’s biological father, is not married to mother, and cannot satisfy the statutory presumptions of paternity set forth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Elisa B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re Nicholas H.California Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. R.M. v. T.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. J.R. v. D.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Martinez v. VaziriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. W.S. v. S.T., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. D.Z. (In re L.L.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API