Legal Opinion

Neil S. v. Mary L.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 2011No. D057777PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

O’ROURKE, J.

Appellant Neil S. appeals from an order granting respondents Mary L. and Scott J.’s motion1 to quash Neil’s petition to establish paternity, obtain joint custody and reasonable visitation, pay child support, and for genetic testing. In that petition, Neil sought to establish a parent-child relationship with twins bom to Mary while she was married to Scott, who had accepted the children as his own. Asserting his relationship with the children began in útero while he attended to Mary’s neonatal care and sang or talked to the unborn children, and that Mary and Scott obstructed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. J.R. v. D.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. W.S. v. S.T., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. V.S. v. M.L.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Folsom Police Dept. v. M.C.California Court of Appeal · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API