Legal Opinion
Dawn D. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1998No. S060966PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this case we determine whether the presumption created by Family Code section 76111 and the standing rule embodied in *935section 2 constitutionally may be applied to preclude an alleged biological father from establishing his paternity of a child bom during the mother’s marriage to another man. The husband in this case is presumed to be the child’s natural father, as the child was bom during the marriage (§ 7611, subd. (a)) and he has received the child into his home and openly holds out the child as his natural child (§7611, subd. (d)). Because, however, the husband and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- In re LiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- T.P. v. T.W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- In Re JLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.