Legal Opinion
V.S. v. M.L.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 2013No. A138827PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
V.S. (Victor)1 appeals the dismissal of his petition seeking to establish that he is the father of one-year-old Donald. Based on undisputed *733facts, it appears that while Victor and M.L. (Mary) were romantically involved, Victor impregnated Mary. About one month before Donald was bom their relationship terminated and Mary married Roger. Mary and Roger brought Donald into their home as their son and have prevented Victor from having contact with the child. In response to Victor’s petition to establish a parent-child relationship, Mary moved to dismiss the proceedings on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Dawn D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services v. Irene V.California Court of Appeal · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re D.R. CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re Danny M. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Karen Bendana v. County of Orange, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026