State ex rel. AutoZone, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
{¶ 1} Today we hold that the Industrial Commission does not abuse its discretion when it finds that a claimant has suffered “the loss of the sight of an eye” under R.C. 4123.57(B) when a doctor diagnoses the claimant as “legally blind” in that eye due to an industrial injury. We thus affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} On January 16, 2004, Stephen Gaydosh, an employee of AutoZone, Inc., perforated his left eye with a screwdriver while installing a wiper blade. Gay-dosh’s workers’ compensation claim was allowed for “perforated globe left eye.”
{¶…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Avalon Precision Casting Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Seibert v. Richard Cyr, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Bennett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.