Queen City Coach Co. v. Carolina Coach Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
Carolina, Liberty and Lloyds move at the outset to dismiss the appeal on the ground that judgment was rendered in favor of Virginia at the trial and that in consequence Virginia has no right to appeal. The movers find color of support for their position in the recital of the judgment that Queen is not entitled to recover anything from Virginia. The judgment is to be interpreted, however, in the light of the pleadings, the issues, the findings of fact, and the conclusions of law. Berrier v. Commissioners, 186 N.C. 564, 120 S.E. 328; Weeks v. McPhail, 129 N.C. 73, 39 S.E. 732; Taunton v. Dobbs,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Griggs v. . York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Poole v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Attorney General v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Smith v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Greene v. Town of ValdeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- White v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re Applications for Reassignment BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State Trust Co. v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.