Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1909PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

This is an appeal from a formal decree entered by a single justice in pursuance of a rescript from the full court. The decree is printed in connection with the former decision of this case in 198 Mass., at page 433. The only question open on this appeal is whether the decree properly conforms to the rescript. Lincoln v. Eaton, 132 Mass. 63, 69. Nashua & Lowell Railroad, v. Boston & Lowell Railroad, 169 Mass. 157,162. Humphrey v. Baker, 103 U. S. 736. Sewall v. Sewall, 130 Mass. 201. Attorney General v. Williams, 140 Mass. 329, 336.

The rescript ordering a “ decree for the informant ” was sent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nashua & Lowell Railroad v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Humphrey v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Attorney General v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Lincoln v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Sewall v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Commonwealth v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Town of Billerica v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Yankee Network, Inc. v. GibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API