Legal Opinion
Greene v. Town of Valdese
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 2, 1982No. 4PA82PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
By their first assignment of error, petitioners contend that the trial court erred in holding that respondent Town complied with the provisions of G.S. 160A-36(d) in fixing the area to be annexed.
G.S. 160A-36 provides:
§ 160A-36. Character of area to be annexed.—{a.) A municipal governing board may extend the municipal corporate limits to include any area which meets the general standards of subsection (b), and which meets the requirements of subsection (c).(b) The total area to be annexed must meet the following standards:(1) It must be adjacent or contiguous to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Montgomery v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Lithium Corp. of America v. Town of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Carolina Builders Corp. v. Howard-Veasey Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Putnam Park Associates v. Fahnestock & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Fowler Ex Rel. Fowler v. Unified School District No. 259District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Lunsford v. RennCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.