Legal Opinion

Poole v. . Gentry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1948PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EtíviN, J.

Exceptions 19 and 20 challenge the validity of the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial judge and the judgment entered thereon upon the ground that the findings of fact were “based upon incompetent evidence and contrary to the weight of all the evidence.” These exceptions are unavailing. The parties waived trial by jury to the issues of fact in compliance with the provisions of the perti nent statute. G. S.. 1-184. This being the ease, the findings of fact of the trial judge are as conclusive as the verdict of a jury if there was evidence to support them. Eley v. R.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Francis v. . FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. McKay v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Eley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Cowles v. . ReavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Fish v. . HansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Reid v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API