Legal Opinion

Griggs v. . York-Shipley, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErviN, J.

The defendant, York-Shipley, asserts on its appeal by appropriate assignments of error that the pleadings of the plaintiffs do not state a cause of action against it for recovery of the freight charges, and that by reason thereof the court erred in concluding and adjudging that it is liable to plaintiffs for the same.

The pleadings of the plaintiffs are somewhat informal and do not contain any specific demand for judgment against the defendant, York-Shipley, for the amount of the freight charges. In consequence, they fall short of the standard of good pleading under G.S. 1-122, which clearly…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. J. F. French & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Carter v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORP.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Chappell v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API