Legal Opinion

Farmers' Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1913No. 7310PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson District Court. — Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

The Farmers’ Reservoir and- Irrigation Company instituted proceedings under the Eminent Domain Act to condemn a right of way for its canal across a quarter section of' land owned by A. A. Cooper and occupied by Frank Merrick, as tenant, under a lease from Cooper, both of whom were made parties to the proceeding.. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict brought in, fixing the value of the land actually taken at $747.50, and the damages to the residue at $6,229.00, *404and a judgment rendered accordingly. From this judgment the company has appealed. For convenience, we shall hereafter refer to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver City Irrigation & Water Co. v. MiddaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Newgass v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Colorado M. R'y Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. La Plata Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. CumminsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API