Legal Opinion
Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 6, 1977No. C-959PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
The Denver Urban Renewal Authority (DURA) commenced an eminent domain proceeding to condemn two parcels of real property owned by Berglund-Cherne Co. (property owner). The property which is the subject of this condemnation proceeding is located at 8th and Curtis Streets in the City of Denver and is within the Auraria Urban Renewal Project. Trial of the issues was before a commission. The commission filed a certificate of ascertainment and assessment which set the total value of the parcels at $263,800. The award of $245,800 for the larger of the two parcels was appealed by DURA to the court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. QuickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Atkinson v. MarquartArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- City & County of Denver v. LyttleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- H. & H. Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Bly v. StorySupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Western Cities Broadcasting, Inc. v. SchuellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- City of Wichita v. EisenringSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.