Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Quick

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 19, 1941No. 14,709PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

Plaintiff in error city here seeks a reversal of a judgment awarding compensation to defendants in error for 800 acres of agricultural lands actually taken in their entirety by the city in the exercise of its right of eminent domain and allowing damages resulting therefrom to a 160-acre residue not taken. Two separate actions to condemn such tracts were consolidated for trial and the causes are presented here on one record. The errors assigned are directed to the alleged incompetency of certain witnesses for defendants; to the refusal of instructions tendered by the city; to the admission and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wassenich v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Central R.R. Co. of N.J. v. State Tax Dept.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Weyer v. Chicago, Wisconsin & Northern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. City & County of Denver v. LyttleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Good v. AB Chance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Stewart v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  5. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API