Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Daniels & Daniels Construction Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1990No. 55PA90PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

The question presented in this workers’ compensation case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that defendant-carrier was estopped to deny plaintiff workers’ compensation coverage. We hold that the Court of Appeals erred and remand this case to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Plaintiff and Bobby Harrelson owned and operated C & H Builders, a partnership which performed carpentry work for general contractors. Plaintiff and Harrelson, as C & H Builders, were hired by defendant Daniels and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Thomas & HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Purser v. Heatherlin PropertiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Hughart v. Dasco Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Huberth v. HollyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  5. Garrett v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API