Skidmore v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*751OPINION
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
Charles Craig Skidmore appeals his conviction for bodily injury to a child. In nine points of error, he contends that the State did not prove the culpable mental state required for the offense; that the great weight and preponderance of the evidence does not support his conviction; that the trial court’s voir dire instructions were erroneous; that photographs and hearsay evidence were erroneously admitted; and that the prosecutor’s closing argument im-permissibly commented on his failure to testify. Skidmore also complains that the jury charge erroneously…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Meraz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Dillon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Zarco v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Cover v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
- Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
- Christopher Kotaska v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.