Moore v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEDGES, Justice.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a complaint about unobjected to comments by the trial judge on the weight of the evidence is fundamental error that may *920be raised for the first time on appeal. We hold that it is not and affirm the conviction.
A jury found appellant, Roderick DePaul Moore, guilty of possession of a controlled substance and aggravated assault of a police officer.1 After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the trial court assessed punishment at 25-years confinement for each conviction with the sentences to run concurrently. In two…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- Nhan Tu Hoang v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- In re A.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Oulare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Marshall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.