Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 21, 1995No. 01-94-00437-CRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEDGES, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a complaint about unobjected to comments by the trial judge on the weight of the evidence is fundamental error that may *920be raised for the first time on appeal. We hold that it is not and affirm the conviction.

A jury found appellant, Roderick DePaul Moore, guilty of possession of a controlled substance and aggravated assault of a police officer.1 After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the trial court assessed punishment at 25-years confinement for each conviction with the sentences to run concurrently. In two…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  2. Nhan Tu Hoang v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. In re A.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Oulare v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. Marshall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API