Legal Opinion

Meraz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1990No. 982-86, 983-86PublishedCited by 454 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

DUNCAN, Judge.

The appellant was convicted by a jury in one trial of two offenses: aggravated sexual assault and injury to a child. The jury assessed his punishment on the sexual assault offense at eighteen years in the Texas Department of Corrections and on the injury to a child at eight years in the Texas Department of Corrections.

Prior to his trial, the appellant claimed he was incompetent to stand trial. Art. 46.02, V.A.C.C.P. Accordingly, the trial judge impaneled a jury to resolve that issue. Art. 46.02, § 4(a), V.A.C.C.P. Obviously,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by454 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

449 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API