Legal Opinion

Zarco v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 21, 2006No. 14-04-01125-CRPublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

In this appeal from a jury’s guilty verdict of indecency with a child, we are asked to find egregious harm from the trial court’s failure to give a reasonable doubt instruction at the punishment phase of trial. We also are asked to decide if the State timely identified its outcry witness when the proper notice was given only thirteen days before the jury was sworn but fourteen days before evidence was first received.

We conclude that appellant was not egregiously harmed by the lack of a reasonable doubt instruction because the weight of the evidence…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Shaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Kenneth Lee Polk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  4. Lamerand v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. William Owens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API