Legal Opinion
Post v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 1989No. CV-88-0191-PRPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
We granted review to examine the need for and degree of specificity in findings and awards required in workers’ compensation cases. See Rule 23(c), Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3); A.R.S. §§ 12-120.24 and 23-948, and Rule 10, Ariz.R.P. Spec.Act, 17B A.R.S.
FACTS
On June 3, 1982, Elwood C. Post (Post) suffered a work-related back injury at Holsum Bakery. Argonaut Insurance Company (Argonaut), the bakery’s compensation carrier, acknowledged Post’s injury as work-related and accepted his claim. Argonaut referred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Perry v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Sproul v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Pearce Development v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Cavco Industries v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Linda Bell v. Ica/ Maricopa Cty/ Pinnacle RiskArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Shelby School v. Arizona State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Landon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Miller v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.