Legal Opinion
James Perrussel and Deborah Perrussel v. Stainless Construction Company Dba Sg Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1995No. 93-16409Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
51 F.3d 282
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James PERRUSSEL and Deborah Perrussel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STAINLESS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY dba SG Communications, Inc.,
Defendant-Appellees.
No. 93-16409.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.*
Decided March 22, 1995.
1
Before: SNEED, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.