Legal Opinion

Butler v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1937No. Civil No. 3917PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal by Walter J. Butler, hereinafter called petitioner, from an award of the Industrial Commission denying him compensation. The facts upon which the award is based are not in dispute, and may be stated as follows:

Nace Municipal Stadium is a corporation which operates an athletic park near the city of Phoenix, commonly known as Nace stadium, and which we shall hereafter refer to as the stadium company. Riverside Amusement Company is a corporation which operates an amusement park near the same city, and which we shall hereafter call the park company. Harry L. Nace is a very heavy…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Strauss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API