Legal Opinion
Moore v. Bush
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 23, 2009No. Civ. 07-107 (RMC)PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
John Moore filed a complaint against numerous defendants alleging that he was “implanted with a micro-chip” for the purpose of controlling his brain and that he was the victim of a conspiracy to develop and use brainwave technology for warrantless surveillance. He also seeks records related to such alleged brainwave technology and surveillance via the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. Compl. ¶¶ 16, 29, 33 & 40. Previously, the Court dismissed all claims, other than the FOIA claim, and all defendants, other than the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Valfells v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Marino v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Wilson v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Barouch v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.