Legal Opinion

Shirley v. National Applicators of California, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 26, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2365PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

Appellants are the owners of a tract of land suitable for use as a sand and gravel pit. On May 9, 1972, appellants entered into a written lease with appellee National Applicators of California, Inc., permitting the latter to conduct sand and gravel operations on the property for a period of three years. The lease set forth a royalty schedule and contained a non-assignment clause.

Appellee Rosario Brabant was engaged by National on a per ton basis to provide crusher services. “Pit run” from the sand and gravel operation was processed to create a product designated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Welter v. M & M WOODWORKING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rendall v. Pioneer Hotel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Smithrock Quarry, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Hauskins v. McGillicuddyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Superior Companies v. Kaiser Cement Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Coeur D'Alene Lakeshore Owners & Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API