Shirley v. National Applicators of California, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
Appellants are the owners of a tract of land suitable for use as a sand and gravel pit. On May 9, 1972, appellants entered into a written lease with appellee National Applicators of California, Inc., permitting the latter to conduct sand and gravel operations on the property for a period of three years. The lease set forth a royalty schedule and contained a non-assignment clause.
Appellee Rosario Brabant was engaged by National on a per ton basis to provide crusher services. “Pit run” from the sand and gravel operation was processed to create a product designated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barnes v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Welter v. M & M WOODWORKING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Rendall v. Pioneer Hotel, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Smithrock Quarry, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Fousel v. Ted Walker Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Hauskins v. McGillicuddyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Superior Companies v. Kaiser Cement Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Coeur D'Alene Lakeshore Owners & Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.