Legal Opinion

Smithrock Quarry, Inc. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1962No. 36166PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This action was brought to recover compensation for an alleged taking of the plaintiff’s rights in a rock quarry in the area of Vancouver, Washington. It was alleged that the plaintiff, under an assignment of lease, had the right to remove rock materials which were lying on the land, and that the defendant, by its highway construction activities, had made it impossible to remove the materials. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff’s contentions and returned a verdict in the amount of $80,000.

It is the contention of the defendant, on this appeal, that the trial court allowed the jury to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Indian Creek Marble Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
  2. Cole v. Ellwood Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. State v. MOTTMAN MERC. CO., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Armstrong v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. West Virginia Department of Highways v. RodaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Petition of City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Knox Lime Co. v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API