Legal Opinion

Francis v. Bohart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1914Published

From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is an action by I. M. Francis against W. A. Bohart. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Respondent moves to strike appellant’s abstract of record from the files. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett.

Read the full summary

From Lane: Lawrence T. Harris, Judge. This is an action by I. M. Francis against W. A. Bohart. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Respondent moves to strike appellant’s abstract of record from the files. Department 2. Statement by Mr. Justice Burnett. This action was commenced to recover tbe possession of seven cows, two heifers, and four calves, of tbe alleged value of $745. Tbe defendant admits tbe possession of tbe cattle and tbe demand for their custody. Otherwise be denies tbe complaint. He further answers that tbe plaintiff represented to bim that be bad sold tbe…

1Opinion

*3Reversed April 13, 1915.

On the Merits.

(147 Pac. 755.)

Reversed. For appellant there was a brief and an oral argument by Mr. H. E. Slattery. For respondent there was a brief over the names of Mr. J. F. Brumbaugh, Mr. Fred E. Smith and Mr. G. N. Parmenter, with an oral argument by Mr. Brumbaugh. Mr. Justice Burnett

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. A contract whereby the possession of personal property is delivered to a buyer, who agrees to pay a price for the same, with the condition that the title remain in the seller until the price is paid, constitutes a conditional sale of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. White v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Frisch v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Wilson v. BuellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API