White v. Ladd
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. This was originally an action to recover money by Isam White against A. H. Johnson, accompanied by an attachment. Johnson was out of the state, and died a few hours after the action had been commenced. His executrix was substituted as defendant, and, upon her death, her administrator became defendant. The present appeal is from an order sustaining objections to the confirmation of a sale of part of the attached property.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
This is the third appeal, and the question now presented is raised by a motion to set aside a sale of attached property on execution, and to vacate the judgment directing the sale, and has relation to the sufficiency and validity of the attachment. A view in the retrospect will not be amiss, in arriving at a clear understanding of the situation. Shortly after the filing *326of the complaint in this action against A. H. Johnson, and the issuance of the summons and writ of attachment, and after the appointment of Cordelia Johnson executrix of the will of defendant, who died before the summons could…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Dwight v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Glenn v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1887
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Gwynn v. WilhelmOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Ruckman v. Union Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.