Wilson v. Buell
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Berkshire, J. —
This case was tried by the court, and at the request of both parties there was a special finding made. Counsel for the appellee contend that the special finding is not properly in the record, and is therefore, in effect, but a general finding.
Counsel’s contention is not tenable. The record shows that, at the proper time, both plaintiff and defendant requested a special finding; this is all that the statute requires.
Upon the facts as found the court stated its conclusions of law in favor of the appellee.
*316The appellant excepted to the conclusions of law, and judgment was rendered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
- City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Gould v. HaydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Richardson v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Parker v. ObenchainIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnson v. Knudson-Mercer Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Bachtenkircher, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
- Draper v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.